DASHCAM

Olympus E-300 and Fuji FinePix Z10fd – Jankuary Roadtrip – Battle of the CCDs

Looking back maybe I tempted destiny. This Jankuary street journey retraced the steps of a visit I made within the late Nineteen Eighties to retrieve our Combi van that had damaged down when my spouse and I have been driving again to Adelaide alongside the river Murray and I made a few photoessays alongside the way in which. On this latest journey we have been heading up the Murray and I believed I’d take a few Janky and nerdy digicams with me to relive the street journey photographic expertise. This was a high-quality thought so far as it went and I threw myself into it with delight however then historical past repeated and our van broke down on this journey as properly. I’m hoping at some point to look again on this journey with fondness; and certainly my views at the moment are softening, however as I kind this driving a bus to Melbourne with no thought when the van might be mounted issues are nonetheless a bit fraught.

Jankuary Hume 00a
Epic street journey – exhibiting the place we noticed the large Murray Cod and the place the van broke down.

I can now additionally confess that I had fallen prey to the CCD vs CMOS sensor chatter, and wished to type my very own views. Specifically I felt the necessity to search the mythic Kodak CCD and drink of its nectar.

The Contenders:

Hume Jankuary 01a
Right here they’re – The tiny FinePix Z10fd and the Oly.mpus E-300 in 4/3 (not Micro 4/3) mount. I shot this on a Fuji S5 Professional with the “Tremendous CCD” Sensor. It’s all CCD round right here, pals.

I used to be actually enthusiastic for this journey. I had a tiny CCD digicam; the Fuji FinePix Z10fd (2007) – a mum cam; it legitimately got here from my sister in regulation, an avid mum-photograper. I paired this with a dad-cam the type of the now-trendy Olymus E-Volt E300 with equipment lens and the fascinating Kodak CCD “film-like” sensor (2004).

Hume Jank 8
The Large Cod in Swan Hill. SOOC jpeg colors from the Olympus. How film-like hey. In all seriousness, there actually is nothing flawed with this. I feel it’s a pleasant file.

So what do we have now right here? There’s a lot I may write and I’m positive these ideas will result in different articles. For a begin, what does “film-like” even imply? I’m nonetheless fascinated by that. And secondly what the hell is the purpose of capturing an outdated digicam when you’ve an iPhone in your pocket? There are factors to this and I feel they’re fairly necessary however I’ll be transient about that. Thirdly, is there truly a degree to any of this? I used to be getting fairly jaded about the entire clickbait jungle on YouTube; the “Most movie like digital camera – the outcomes will shock you!” and felt if I learn that once more I’ll puke, however I do truly consider there’s something good about these cameras and there’s one thing good about utilizing them and there’s one thing nice about taking a cheapo factor that was going to be landfill (or e-waste at greatest) and having a bunch of enjoyable with it making some photos.

Hume Jank 5
Fuji – an Australian street shot by means of the windscreen.
Hume Jank 4
Fuji – shot from the window whereas driving.

And to be blunt – if some Dunning-Kruger delusionals are frothing over a 35mm P&S why ought to they not do the identical over a digicam? What’s the distinction if we’re all having enjoyable: isn’t that sufficient? Isn’t the entire thought a couple of level and shoot that you simply don’t have to know the techie stuff? You level it and also you shoot it and revel in it and you’ll inform analogue grandpas like me to piss off.

The Digicam Expertise:

OK – If I’m going to choose the three essential variations between capturing a digicam and capturing a telephone I’d say:
1: Ergonomics and price. You possibly can shoot this rattling factor in a single hand-held out of your van window if you’re driving alongside a rustic street. Should you’re going to try this with a $1000 iPhone good luck you’re braver than I’m.

Hume Jank 6
Fuji. Some sheep snapped from the window whereas driving. Concentrating on the street not the sheep clearly.

2: This stuff have flash – as in an actual honest-to-goodness flash, not an LED that your telephone has an which wants longer exposures to work. This can be a nostalgic search for positive; going again to the times of the Magicube on the highest of your 126 Instamatic. So far as I’m conscious you may’t but faux this look – I’m not saying it received’t occur however for the time being you may’t.

Hume Jank 3 2
Fuji, Flash. Me idly questioning how the flash would expose the wall slightly than composing a shot.

3: The third level leads straight on from the second and includes the wonderful computational energy in smartphones which I feel is larger than any developments in sensors or lenses. I used to be reminded of this when capturing the digicam alongside a contemporary iPhone that pulled up the sunshine ranges of the topic, making an honest shot out one thing that on movie or a straight digicam would depart the topic completely underexposed with respect to background. Our telephones simply don’t give us these dud photographs with hopelessly below or over uncovered topics that we bought within the outdated days.

Hume Jank 16
Fuji. Attempt getting a shot like this from an iPhone.

So in a manner the digicam expertise all will get tough and it will get good and as well as it’s one thing cool, and to wrap it up you’ve bought this pretty little devoted shiny digital camera that’s possibly one third the scale of an enormous new iPhone and it value you about the identical as a cocktail. And in case you’re on an evening out on the tiles and also you pull out the digicam you’re doing one thing completely different: you’re getting a distinct picture of the occasion and also you’re making it another way and the connection you’ve with the folks you’re taking the image of is completely different due to the instrument you’re utilizing, I reckon that’s just about the way it goes and it’s an awesome factor. Living proof – I used to be out having a sandwich with my daughter in Melbourne and a cool child pulled out their digicam and their pals all lined up for a photograph whereas they have been ready for his or her sandwiches. Good.

Hume Jank 7
Fuji – the van earlier than it broke down. You possibly can not accuse the Fuji of medical sharpness.

The Mum-Cam:

I’m calling this tiny digicam the mum-cam as an indication of respect to individuals who have extra necessary duties at hand than caring a couple of digital camera; who worth operate, ease of use, reliability and portability as a part of a life-style that’s already tough sufficient to navigate with out including complexity.

Hume Jank 34
The Fuji shot on the Oly – blurry as a result of it’s hand-held on the journey, however all the pieces on this story is Jank.

However it’s additionally a daughter-cam. My youthful daughter tells me with certainty that this purple digital camera was given to her for her birthday when she was in main faculty and that she and all her pals had one just like it; that the tiny sliding-cover Fuji was the digital camera that everybody took to sleepovers the place infinite group selfies have been taken as a full of life group of pre-adolescents bonded and shaped notions of self-identity.

Hume Jank 17
Fuji – snapping some sulphur-crested cockatoos whereas driving my bike.

The Dad-Cam:

With out dissing on the dads (I’m one) I’m calling the Olympus E-300 the dad-cam. By that I imply it’s purchased by somebody who isn’t a photographer however purchased it partly on the premise of specs learn in {a magazine} and partly due to its slight technical overkill. (what’s a porro finder anyway?) The dad has purchased the megapixels, the equipment zoom and desires uncooked however doesn’t know tips on how to edit it. (we’re again within the mid-2000s bear in mind)

Hume Jank 12
Olympus – very attention-grabbing shot of the bridge. If I have been eager I’d use a uncooked shot and elevate the shadows.
Hume Jank 3 4
Fuji – auto flash fired. That is information in regards to the bridge BTW.

When the Oly was younger I used to be utilizing a Nikon D70 which is a extra succesful digital camera for the industrial stuff I did on the time, however the Olympus is a hoot. I actually like its construct and really feel – extra stable than the D70 from reminiscence, good ergonomics aside from the on-off swap, crisp show and viewfinder, and good metallic surfaces. The menu is so easy in comparison with a contemporary digital camera. What I beloved most although was the concept of adopting the dad-photographer persona of constructing technically first rate images of actually dud topics with the goal of boring the crap out of the parents again dwelling. I revelled within the thought of placing collectively a video slide presentation of the grain silos, bridges and vacationer landmarks of our street journey.

The Photos and the Sensors:

Technical notes. All the pieces right here is SOOC jpeg on customary settings. With the Oly I set publicity to -1/2 a cease as a result of I learn to try this on the web and I feel it’s about proper. I additionally assume it’s justifiable because the form of factor a dad would do. The Fuji is jpeg solely with three “movie” profiles, Normal, Chrome and B&W. (No publicity comp by the way in which.) I feel it’s not within the nature of how these cameras would have been used to stray too removed from that anyway so I’ll simply stick to customary, uncropped, unprocessed SOOC.

Hume Jank 3 3
Olympus – SOOC jpeg. Good sufficient I assume. Be aware: I set the Publicity comp to -1/2 a cease as a result of I learn that on the web and I feel it’s about proper.

The principle purpose I wished to do that was the Oly and the Holy Grail of sensor tech and color science – the Kodak CCD.

I admit I’ve been sensor-curious recently and wished to fulfill myself on the CCD vs CMOS debate. Do CCDs have a particular high quality that makes them magic and film-like? Brief reply is: No, nope, nada, nyet. However I wanted to see that for myself and I additionally have to fess-up that I had a very good laborious poke round and actually hoped I’d discover one thing particular and I didn’t discover it.

Now – I’ve to say there are some actually good youtubers on the market whose views I respect and who’ve appeared with a eager eye at far more sensors than I ever have ( you Ali and James) and so they say smart and properly thought-about issues about these sensors, and there may be additionally sadly an ill-informed cacophony of click-bait-crap “most film-like sensor-ever!” that basically makes it laborious to navigate the waters. A few years in the past once I was making my very own efforts to digitise my outdated Kodachrome photographs I discovered a man saying: “Leica M8 – like capturing a steady roll of Kodachrome.” And he’d by no means shot a body of Kodachrome in his life which I’d say makes the comparability tough. To be truthful, I contacted him and we had a pleasant dialogue by which he defined his place, however nonetheless, I imply – actually? Think about if I wrote “I’ve shot a number of Kodachrome and I’ve to say it’s similar to capturing an M8. Oh, by the way in which; I’ve by no means shot an M8.” Anyway, analogue-grandpa rant over.

Hume Jank 31
Fuji – shot from the bus window whereas typing this up on the way in which all the way down to Melbourne.

The E-300 Expertise:

Hume Jank 33

Hume Jank 32
The Oly shot entrance and rear in our condominium utilizing the tiny Fuji. As a result of Jankuary.

I’ll be capturing a marriage subsequent month and can use my Nikon D700 and Df. I’d not use the E-300. That type of sums it up… all three of those cameras are older DSLRs however the Nikons I don’t regard as “good for his or her age,” they’re merely “good.” The construct high quality of all three is about the identical; the Olympus is actually up there. The Oly is slower in operation, a lot much less refined in AF and so on, however it’s additionally older than the others. It’s slower than the D70 was too. Mine was nice worth – a minty equipment with battery grip, equipment zoom, a few batteries and CF card, all for about EUR 150. Is it value chasing the magic Kodak CCD sensor? Not in my guide; it’s a pleasant digital camera however I’m not ingesting the Kool Support. However hey, that is stated from a private perspective, and I’d additionally say that my favorite three sensors are the Nikon D700/D3 Df/D4 and Fuji X-Trans II, that are usually fairly extremely regarded. I by no means actually got down to hunt these sensors down, they only got here my manner and I lucked out from the beginning, and if there are sensors higher than these they must be a good bit higher to impress me. The Oly is a pleasant digital camera, and the sensor is a pleasant sensor; a very nice sensor, however it’s not magic.  Like I stated, I used to be capturing SOOC jpegs within the Oly, and once I had a play with the raws I used to be certainly capable of get one thing nicer, and that’s what I’d do; play with these and work out tips on how to get the very best in line with my very own style. However I’ve already executed that with the Nikons so why hassle?

However look – in capturing the E-300 or the Fuji I’d say the expertise is one thing that’s enjoyable, it’s (a lot) slower and less complicated than a contemporary digital camera. It’s is completed for a sure aesthetic slightly than any measurable absolutes of picture high quality; and I’ll should admit that in some methods this aligns itself with the expertise of (attracts breath)… capturing  movie.

To show again the clock and see modern opinions of the Oly and Fuji you may learn right here for the Fuji and right here for the Oly

Thanks for studying.

Share this put up:


Supply hyperlink

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button